![Mayor Andrea Metcalf with then council Games director Andrew Cooney the day Victoria 2026 was cancelled by the state government. Picture by Darren Howe Mayor Andrea Metcalf with then council Games director Andrew Cooney the day Victoria 2026 was cancelled by the state government. Picture by Darren Howe](/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/Tom.OCallaghan/3bc4965c-2c7b-4a97-99a0-c54184f41a46.jpg/r0_0_4276_2849_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg)
Greater Bendigo's council will skip an inquiry into the Commonwealth Games fiasco, saying it is not in a position to give meaningful insights.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
"These concerns all went unanswered and they turned [out] to be well-founded because weeks later the Games were cancelled," he told the inquiry.
Bendigo did not know what its Games role was
Bendigo's council will not give evidence despite being a key host city, making it a notable absence when senators hear testimony at the Quality Lakeside Hotel, across the road from Lake Weeroona, on Tuesday, August 29.
The council declined an invitation because it felt it was not in a position to comment on Victoria's preparedness to host the Games, acting strategy and growth director Andrew Cooney told the Bendigo Advertiser.
"We were still confirming what our role was going to be, up and until the Games were cancelled," he said.
More news:
Asked whether it would be worth sharing experiences regardless to help planning for Brisbane's 2032 Olympics and Paralympics, Mr Cooney said he was not aware that was the scope of the inquiry but that the council would likely be unable to give an informed insight.
"Again, we didn't have confirmation about what our role was. That was a work in progress and was all pretty new, when the inquiry had commenced," he said.
"It was pretty difficult for council to make submissions when we weren't sure what our role was."
The council had no concerns an inquiry appearance would compromise its relationship with the state government, Mr Cooney said, and Spring Street had no conversations or correspondence about the matter.
Hip pocket hit worried Geelong council
Geelong's mayor told the inquiry on July 28 his council was increasingly concerned about the bill it might have had to foot as the Games developed.
Cr Sullivan said Geelong had entered very early discussions in early 2023 about potential council spending on the Games, which would have been "well in excess" of what his council could have provided.
"I heard they could be as high as $50 million," Cr Sullivan said.
That was far more than the $15-$20 million government bureaucrats estimated councils would need to contribute. That figures was in a business case put to senior state political leaders in 2022 before Victoria decided to host the Games.
Bendigo's council has previously gone on the record saying it was not concerned about its potential spends.
"That wasn't Bendigo's experience, we've been supportive of it all the way through," mayor Andrea Metcalf said on the day the Games were cancelled.
"We don't have a lot of debt as a city and would have expected to make a contribution to legacy builds."
Bendigo council could give evidence to other inquiries
It is too early to confirm what information Bendigo's council would share with other inquiries into the Games' collapse, including a bipartisan Victorian upper house inquiry.
A separate Victorian Auditor General's Office inquiry has flagged that it will seek information from Bendigo as it delves into the costs of securing, planning for and exiting the Games.
"How much of that will be for council and how much will be for government is still to come through," Mr Cooney said.
The government cancelled the Games in July citing apparent cost blowouts of billions of dollars. Its leaders have so far declined to give testimony to the senate inquiry but have been cooperating with the Auditor General's Office investigation.
Digital subscribers now have the convenience of faster news, right at your fingertips with the Bendigo Advertiser app. Click here to download.